Muslim appeasement Vs Brahmin Appeasement

Gandhiji is being vehemently blamed for starting Muslim appeasement and in the way harmed Hindu society in one or other way. Is there something the concept of Brahmin appeasement? Does caste play great role even during freedom struggle? After all many must have eyed who will grab power post freedom movement. It was certain that Gandhiji was not going to rule the country as he had not developed himself in that way. He was no different from earlier God Father of the country in consonance of Brahmnical way of ruling the country as Kings were supposed to implement the ideas of Brahmins (Guru), otherwise they were abolished and new Kings were installed. Chanakya, Krishna, Guru Ram Das and so Gandhiji followed the same suit.

We have been taught that Nehru was called Panditji because he was a great scholar. But it is proven that Rajendra Prasadji, Dr. Ambedkar were even greater scholars of those time and yet they were not designated as Panditji. If we see this in rude way, then we find that saying some (Brahmins) as Panditji, he immediate falls into your way. This is the way how some Brahmins used to gain favour of other Brahmins by calling them Panditji. Even in my company (a PSU) I have found one senior employee addressing all the Brahmin employees by Panditji. The same practice is being followed by trainers who occasionally come to train employees here. Based on this idea, it may be concluded that Panditji behind Nehru is not given for his scholarship but appeasing Brahmins and for his acceptance in the society at grass root level, after all masses of India are being opinionated by Brahmins only. In that way Gandhiji’s leadership would remain protected from Brahmin hegemony.

Patelji was not made the PM. Had his caste some role for such deviation? That may be explored.

Khilaphat Andolan has been chosen meticulously by Gandhiji for appealing Muslim masses. Tilakji had already  done the same by organizing worshipping Ganesh and Shivaji for appealing Hindu masses. For keeping Muslim league on the bay, Khilaphat movement must have played great role. For making freedom struggle successful, unity of India was important need of the hour.

Anyway deeper thoughts will come out from students of History, this is my view seeing the nature of contemporary politics and society.

But I believe Gandhiji has helped in making thousands of volunteers who sacrificed their life for the upliftment of downtrodden society of India. He meticulously divided politics and social/spiritual arena.


You may read these view here also:

http://mkgandhi.org/assassin.htm